SPRINGFIELD — (Peoria Journal Star) Illinois’ largest agricultural organization is gearing up for federal limits on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from farms, though just what form such limits would take remains far from decided. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency just completed the first step toward new rules on greenhouse-gas emissions linked to global warming, including emissions from livestock and poultry operations.
A major concern is a so-called “cow tax” on farm operations, though a specific tax has not been proposed, Chuck Spencer, director of national legislation and policy development for the Illinois Farm Bureau, said Monday. “I think it’s fair to say that greenhouse emissions were a big part of the presidential campaign, and it’s certainly clear it’s a priority for the incoming (Obama) administration,” said Spencer.
The 80,000-member organization warned producers in a December newsletter that extension of greenhouse-emission limits to cattle, hog and poultry operations might result in a fee and permit system similar to that already required for other pollutants. Spencer said including farm emissions in the greenhouse-gas rules would represent a major change in the federal definition of air pollutants, one that also could be expensive for farmers.
“What we want to do is draw attention to the EPA rulemaking, and make sure what you set this at and what they’re trying to do, and for heaven’s sake, be careful how you set the fee structures and who you impact,” he said. An early draft suggested a permit and fee system would be needed to control farm emissions, though an analysis by the U.S. Department of Agriculture concluded it would be difficult to track airborne emissions from manure, fertilizers and other farming byproducts.
“These emissions are not easily calculated or controlled. Moreover, many of the emissions are the result of natural biological processes that are as old as agriculture itself,” the department concluded.
A spokesman for the EPA released a statement that said the agency “is not proposing a cow tax,” and that a deadline has not been set for final rules. The statement said federal regulators are looking at a number of options for control of greenhouse emissions after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last year such emissions should be classified as “pollutants.”
Efforts to reach representatives of the Sierra Club were unsuccessful Monday, but a variety of environmental groups have weighed in on behalf of strict new limits on greenhouse-gas emissions, including from “factory farms.”
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling also found states have the authority to regulate greenhouse emissions, but Maggie Carson of the Illinois EPA said states have been hesitant to act until federal limits are set.









12 comments:
If this is really true then I'm embarassed to be an American. The lunatics truly will have taken over the asylum. Eric, also you might note that the main greenhouse gas is actually water vapor.
The whole "Man-made" global warming fiasco has all the hallmarks of an error pyramid or a religion. If Obama's administration enacts this stupidity, then it's time to prepare for the other crazy things people have suggested to "cure" so-called global warming and plan for major increases in the cost of electricity.
David: Water vapor in the atmosphere is indeed a greenhouse gas. I was thinking the #1 and #2 man-made, or better yet, human-induced greenhouse gases are CO2 and methane. Thanks for catching that! -ES
I dont know what to say, this is so Stupid! If this were too happen watch them redesign our Commodes to catch the gasses coming out our Arse's and Tax us for it.
This is the most stupid thing I ever heard of! What the heck? Of course PETA they want it, here's the link to watch it
http://www.midwestagnet.com/global/video/popup/pop_playerLaunch.asp?vt1=v&clipFormat=undefined&clipId1=3236532&at1=News&h1=Clean Air Act-Livestock Producers
That link is not working for some reason? Just for now go to my blog http://www.ikesyourfriend.com
Water vapor is the most *efficient* greenhouse gas, but it is far from the most *abundant.* In addition, it has a very short residence time compared to other greenhouse gases.
Moooo mooo moooo moooo mooooooooooooo moooo moooo mooo moooooooooo mooo mooo mooo mooo mooo mooooooooo.
I guess I'm a little embarrassed to be living in Rockford. Justin, Adam, and Eric have all pointed out numerous times that climate change, due to warming of the atmosphere, is definitely happening --sticking your head in the sand and pretending it isn't won't make it go away, and certainly won't help your children or grandchildren who have to inherit this environment.
It's also beyond dispute that humans are contributing to the changes in the atmosphere that are causing our average temperatures to increase.
In our family, we eat only grass-fed beef and bison, which is more expensive than the factory-raised, corn fed beef. A wonderful side-effect of this is that we eat less meat in general; this is better for us and better for the environment. I don't really understand how anyone can eat a cow that was raised and killed in a CAFO once you find out how inhumanely they're treated, and once you find out how their treatment affects the meat you are putting in your body.
For anyone who hasn't explored this topic yet, I'd recommend Michael Pollan's books: The Omnivore's Dilemma and In Defense of Food.
If we got rid of the factory farms, we wouldn't have to worry about regulating the greenhouse gasses they emit.
Renee, I'll start with the global warming. I hope you are doing a little more research on global warming than coming to this blog to get all of your information. If not, I'm asking to do your own research and make your own opinions, not ones that someone else makes. While you're doing your research remember that everything will have bias to it so take into account where the writing or report is coming from. To quote Thomas Jefferson "Advertisements contain the only truths to be relied on in a newspaper." Except now days replace newspaper with internet and TV.
Now for your grass fed cattle. You say that this is better for you and the environment. You have been misled when you think that grass fed cattle are better for the environment. Here is a quote straight from the Center for Global food Issues. "New Beef Eco-Report: Pound-for-pound, beef produced with grains and growth hormones produces 40% less greenhouse gas emissions and saves two-thirds more land for nature compared to organic grass-fed beef."
And to comment on the treating of the cattle and big farms why don't you buy your beef from a local farmer and have a local butcher cut it up for you. You'd be killing 2 birds with one stone. You would support the local economy and get your meat from a person that you know.
Hi Adam, I'm a college professor in the field of Earth Systems Science, so I'm pretty well informed on issues concerning the environment.
"The Center for Global Food Issues (CGFI) is a project of the conservative think-tank, the Hudson Institute, and is based in Churchville, Virginia." --not my idea of a good scholarly source.
Did you know it's illegal in Illinois to butcher cattle outside of one of the high-stress factory plants? Of course, that might not have stopped me from getting local beef, but I won't admit to it :-)
Renee, we are all entitled to our own opinion then I'm glad you are informed.
I did not know that about butchering of cattle. I will say that that might not have stopped me either. ;-)
And thanks for pointing out where the CGFI is from, I don't consider myself a conservative or liberal. I guess my "everything will have a bias" was a correct statement again huh?
Oh please. There are some American Greenpeacers over in Asia trying to get farmers to drain their rice fields in between seasons. Cleaning up the atmosphere is a good idea whether one believes in manmade global warming or not but let's keep our heads about this process...
Post a Comment