Every so often, we meteorologists have forecasts that make us want to pound our heads against the nearest wall. The weather for the Tuesday-Wednesday timeframe this week is one of those situations...
The piece of energy that's going to cause our wintry weather isn't yet over land, so our computer models have very little data to use to try to depict how this is going to evolve. The NAM model moves the low through much later than the GFS model... in addition, the path of the low isn't the same, either.
There's a huge amount of uncertainty in the details of this forecast. The generalities, at this point, seem to be ironed out, at least: I expect a wintry mix to develop late Tuesday, lasting into Tuesday night. It may change completely over to rain; the chance of that happening increases the farther south you go. Then on Wednesday, the mix/rain turns over to all snow, along with gusty winds.
However, how much snow any location receives is pretty much completely up in the air at this point. Model output has been seemingly random even in the two most recent model runs; I've seen model output as low as about 2" and as high as 10". Obviously, that sort of range doesn't make me overly confident in how much snow we'll get. We wouldn't be putting out any snowfall forecast maps yet, anyway, but it goes to show how this whole midweek weather situation isn't an easy one to figure out.
We'll be focusing on a few things in determining the forecast this week... in particular, the temperatures at the surface up to about a mile high in the atmosphere. We'll be close to that oh-so-wonderful freezing mark in that entire layer... and a change of a couple degrees could play a big role in who receives what type of precipitation. Also, a more northerly low track would usher in warmer air and decrease the chance of heavier snow... but a southerly track would allow cooler air to prevail, leading to greater snowfall.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Justin, are the models agreeing on the total amount of water in the system?
And we'll all be watching it on Digital TV by then. Maybe.
Warning: GRIPE ahead.
.begin EDITORIAL RANT
Just to indulge in one teeny weenie little gripe. That little converter box that we've all heard at least 10,000 commercials about already. Yeah. Well, it doesn't work "in [some] rural areas" unless you also get a new antenna. According to that antenna website, those of us in Rock County pretty much need to get big expensive outdoor antennas if we really want an antenna that works.
Not willing to get a $300 outdoor antenna (nevermind shipping and installation charges) to replace the rabbit ears on top of my tv set, I got the best indoor antenna I could get for this area.
It works -- so long as (AHEM) the weather isn't too bad. In bad weather (i.e., fog, rain, etc.) the signal keeps breaking up into blocky pixels with no sound. We'll see how well that works out in the coming months I guess (I've had it since last Fall, but I unplugged all the dang contraptions so I could get the GOOD analog signals with my rabbit ears for as long as possible).
Needless to say, I'm underwhelmed, and not looking forward to Severe Storm season.
Its really NOT that "rural, elderly, poor and minority" people (the demographics they keep worrying "aren't ready") are too dense to plug in a converter box, or too dumb to know that we'll have to. Its that we don't want to because it doesn't work as well as the old analog signals we've been getting for free since the 1950's.
Even the overly optimistic FCC acknowledges that 5% of those needing a converter box will have problems receiving broadcast signals after the switch due to signal strength issues.
.end EDITORIAL RANT
Bleh.
I don't have a converter box or a digital television, so my apartment will be broadcast-less until I get around to purchasing either of those, or getting cable. I don't foresee any of those happening anytime soon; I hardly watch TV as it is.
Also... I'm not sure if our digital signal is going at full strength or not. We'll see what happens come 12:30pm Tuesday.
Back to weather... Renee, there are some differences in the total water. That said, they're all showing some pretty decent amounts of liquid equivalent.
1. currently not many stations especially 13 WREX are not transmitting full strength signal for digital... I can't get it at all on an indoor antenna with a booster. Believe me the digital will be much sharper after the transition. (you will also need to re-scan as they will be changing the channel)
2. COME ON 10"!!!
Well for now Im looking forward to the sunshine tomorrow. Going fishing for the first time this year
Post a Comment